Home|GrowerTalks|Green Profit|Ball Publishing|Ball Bookshelf
Friday, September 22, 2017 Vol. 81 No. 5


Also in this issue...

01 |Digital Edition
02 |GT in Brief
03 |SAF in the Lobby
04 |New Products
05 |New Products Submissions


06 |Classifieds
07 |Request Product Info
08 |Article Archive
09 |Acres Online
10 |GreenTalks
11 |Inside Grower
12 |Nursery & Landscape Insider
13 |Perennial Pulse
14 |NewTerrain
15 |Trade Show Calendar
16 |Subscriptions
17 |Hard Goods Distributors
18 |Media Kit 2017


Featured Companies

HORT AMERICAS
FLORASEARCH INC
EMERALD COAST GROWERS
PEN AND PETAL
SUN GRO
HUMMERT INTERNATIONAL
TERRA NOVA NURSERIES INC.
FLORICULTURA B.V.
ATLAS MANUFACTURING INC.
GRIFFIN
>> See All

>> See All Columns Columns
Alkalinity Control with Acid Injection
| Rick Yates
  
>> Published Date: 2/28/2017
 
This is an excerpt from the 4th Edition GGSPro Technical Reference Guide. Chapter 8, “Water Quality and Crop Nutrition,” contains this and much more grower-friendly information including water and soil testing, diagnosing and treating nutritional problems, building fertilizer programs based on water quality, and injector calculations.

It’s strongly recommended to treat highly alkaline water sources with acid to neutralize the alkalinity to a low level, making the water more suitable for production by reducing its ability to raise soil pH. Several options are available for acid injection, including sulfuric, phosphoric, nitric and citric acid.

The characteristics of the various acids make them more or less suitable for greenhouse use, depending on specific situations. Nitric acid is the most caustic option. For this reason, it’s generally avoided in most production settings. The use of phosphoric acid results in the addition of significant amounts of phosphorus to the irrigation water. Since growers generally desire low levels of phosphorus in their water, most elect to avoid injection of phosphoric acid. For organic growers, some forms of citric acid are preferred due to their OMRI status. In most cases, the GGSPro team recommends technical or reagent-grade sulfuric acids. These forms are effective, relatively inexpensive and complement most fertility programs.

When handling acids, care must be taken to protect worker safety. Workers can be injured by direct contact with acid liquids or vapors formed by some acids, including nitric acid. Acids should only be handled in well-ventilated areas. Inhalation or ingestion of acids in liquid or vapor form must be avoided. Direct contact of acid with exposed skin and eyes can cause serious injury. Lightweight, casual clothing doesn’t provide adequate protection from the corrosive action of acids. Fortunately, acids can be handled safely with proper protective gear.

Well-maintained protective gear should include the following items:

• Acid-impervious gloves, suit and boots

• Goggles or face shield

• NIOSH/MSHA-approved full-face respirator for vapor-forming acids

Acids react with water in a strongly exothermic manner, meaning the reaction between water and acid releases much energy. This can cause the solution to boil and lead to acid being dispelled from the stock container. For this reason, it’s extremely important to always add acid to water and to never add water to concentrated acid. When preparing stock solutions, first fill the stock tank with the appropriate amount of water and then add the acid to the larger volume of water.

Growers that inject acid generally do so in a continuous manner. Injectors used in this way should be selected to provide lasting, reliable service and should be approved for use with acids. Multi-head injectors are convenient to use with acids and allow complete separation with other injected materials. Growers can combine acid and fertilizer stock solutions for many fertilizer types. However, calcium-based fertilizers shouldn’t be mixed with acid stock solutions, as a precipitate will form and cause the injector to clog. Examples of calcium-containing fertilizer formulations include, but are not limited to, 15-0-15, 15-0-0 and 13-2-13.

The amount of acid used to neutralize acidity equates to a very dilute solution at the end of the hose, which is completely safe for contact with plants and people. However, this water isn’t considered potable and shouldn’t be used as or added to drinking water.




Using the 2:1 media testing technique
Good management of greenhouse crops requires continuous understanding of crop nutrition. At the most basic level, growers need to understand the media pH and EC to avoid fertility issues. In-house monitoring of media pH and EC is easily performed using the 2:1 testing technique. Regular and consistent testing using the procedure below provides growers with both a snapshot and a trending view of crop fertility. Combining frequent, in-house 2:1 testing with periodic laboratory services provides a full picture of crop nutrition. Remember to calibrate meters on a regular basis.

Collecting media samples
1. Remove the container, leaving the root mass and associated media as intact as possible.

2. Collect several tablespoons of media from a point in the vertical center of the root mass and towards the center of the container OR collect a core sample from the pot, retaining only the middle 50% of the core (discard the top and bottom 25%).

3. Collect samples from five to 10 pots selected randomly from as much of the crop as possible for a combined volume of  1⁄2 cup.

Testing media pH and EC
Materials needed:

• Distilled water

• Two 2-cup glass or plastic measuring cups

• pH and EC meter(s)

• Media sample(s)

Test procedure
1. Rinse container with distilled water.

2. Measure 1⁄2 cup media sample at same density as found in pots.

3. Measure one cup of distilled water and add it to the media.

4. Vigorously mix the sample.

5. Cover to prevent evaporation and allow sample to settle for 60 minutes. Use a consistent settling time across all samples and sampling events.

6. Use meters to test pH and EC of the liquid layer above the settled media. (Solution may be separated using filter paper to filter any remaining media, if desired.)

7. Rinse container thoroughly before storing or processing the next sample.

Understanding results
When comparing test results performed by a commercial lab that uses a saturated media extract (SME) method, 2:1 test results could be 1⁄2 to 1⁄3 of those reported by the lab. GT


Rick Yates is GGSPro Technical Support Manager for Griffin. He can be reached at ggsprotech@griffinmail.com.



© Copyright 2001 - 2017 Ball Horticultural Company  — About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions